<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Important Procurement Information</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chefann.com/blog/archives/507/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chefann.com/blog/archives/507</link>
	<description>Chef Ann Cooper is a renegade lunch lady who works to transform cafeterias into culinary classrooms for students - one school lunch at a time.  She brings you information to learn about the importance of changing the way America feeds its children.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 23:40:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Georgette Yaindl</title>
		<link>http://www.chefann.com/blog/archives/507/comment-page-1#comment-84517</link>
		<dc:creator>Georgette Yaindl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 21:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chefann.com/blog/?p=507#comment-84517</guid>
		<description>Thank you so much for this report.  Doesn&#039;t an earl;ier provision (maybe (c)(1)) of 7 CFR §3016.36(c)(2), state that
STATES SHALL follow state procurement policy in expending fed grant in aid funds, BUT (at (c)(2)) GRANTEES and SUBGRANTEES shall not apply geog. preferences.  A state which directly procures is NOT a grantee.  I ask you this when e kala mai - forgive me- I could jump on LExisNExis and read the stat;  I am a 3L and have been researching procurment preferences and came across a case which dealt with the State, grantee, subgrantee issue, and the pertiment .36 provisions had been adopted as the common rule by some 24 agencies, but other than DOI, I do not know if this include Ag.  I will check it eventually, so you don&#039;t HAVE to respond! but just in case, you might want to read that provision again in its entoirely, and to grasp the distinction between State, grantee, and subgrantee (e.g. a state subs to a school district, the district is a grantee;  the district subs to schools, they are a subgrantee).  Aloha, from UHawai`i school of law.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you so much for this report.  Doesn&#8217;t an earl;ier provision (maybe (c)(1)) of 7 CFR §3016.36(c)(2), state that<br />
STATES SHALL follow state procurement policy in expending fed grant in aid funds, BUT (at (c)(2)) GRANTEES and SUBGRANTEES shall not apply geog. preferences.  A state which directly procures is NOT a grantee.  I ask you this when e kala mai &#8211; forgive me- I could jump on LExisNExis and read the stat;  I am a 3L and have been researching procurment preferences and came across a case which dealt with the State, grantee, subgrantee issue, and the pertiment .36 provisions had been adopted as the common rule by some 24 agencies, but other than DOI, I do not know if this include Ag.  I will check it eventually, so you don&#8217;t HAVE to respond! but just in case, you might want to read that provision again in its entoirely, and to grasp the distinction between State, grantee, and subgrantee (e.g. a state subs to a school district, the district is a grantee;  the district subs to schools, they are a subgrantee).  Aloha, from UHawai`i school of law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

